Firstly i should clarify my own position
I am just an ordinary member of the public who has an interest in flying and i am also interested in this type of aviation. I have never so much flown or indeed handled either a paraglider or paramotor.
All comments are my own opinion and based on my reading material from a variety of sources. I wish to clarify I have no axe to grind or argument with anyone.
I would also like to state that in my own humble opinion, it is difficult to portray emotions in writing properly unless a very skilled writer (I do NOT class myself as one of those either). Anyone with a modicum of online experience will have seen the online arguments despite the presence of numerous "smileys".
Francis, the response on the MEN website seemed alarmist and did NOT mention your proposal. I am not sure of the relevance regarding the demographic. Indeed my first thought was wondering what your agenda was.
Far from reassuring the public that this is a rare event it appeared you wanted to tell the readers that the skies are full of middle aged men who are only too happy to plummet from the skies above maiming and murdering any Innocent children in the vicinity.
I wish to state the above paragraph is sensationalist clap-trap. But I wanted to illustrate how easy it is to sensationalise what was after all an accident.
I don't believe the personal comments are helpful from any party.
The CAA currently have chosen to treat this as a sport and as such not requiring licensing or the rigmarole of certification. The idea I guess is that responsible citizens make their choices. Hopefully logic would prevail and there wouldn't be a multitude of bodies falling from the sky. If I'm not mistaken, the statistics speak for themselves.
Regarding incursions into restricted airspace or breaches of air law? Unfortunately there are a number of selfish people who put their own needs/wants ahead of anyone/everyone else. Whilst I don't recall any commercial jet being brought down by a paramotor I'm sure the possibility does exist. My point is that irrespective of regulations accidents can and will happen. I do not believe that being taught by a licenced instructor would not reduce the possibility. In a single seat aircraft one has to assume responsibility for ones own actions.
I think people look at the sport as the cheapest way to get airborne. Any right minded person will make an informed judgement over the need to obtain suitable training and equipment. If not? Then it's very much a case of buyer beware. Yes it is terrible if innocent people are hurt or killed and in that case I would imagine the clamour for regulation would indeed be vociferous. Again however, whilst there have been fatalities I cannot recall there being any more than more traditional and highly regulated aviation activities.
We live in a state where there is oversight and control of many of our activities. Some of it is required and understandable. Some isn't. I do actually understand your stance on licensing instructors but feel you're trying to fix something which IMHO is not broken.
Can I see a time of regulation? Perhaps, but I hope it's a long time coming. Surely every one of you is flying for the thrill, experience, fun?