Hi Francis et al,
In the spirit of musing...
In any other branch of aviation the prop is significantly better protected from contact with the ground, either by virtue of being mounted higher on the aircraft or simply by being attached to ... oh yes ... an aircraft, something with bits that tend not to compress beyond well defined limits upon a normal impact with the ground. For most of us the prop is sticking down below the most rigid part of the fuselage (the pilot's spine and backside) so any landing that results in a failure of the undercarriage (legs) will almost certainly result in the prop coming to to contact with the ground. Given that human legs and hillsides everywhere are always going to result in stumbles and trips I think it is inevitable that unexpected foldups of the undercarriage will happen.
Continuing the musing and looking at the the other elements...
I was taught that I should cut the engine well before getting close enough to the ground for the prop to come in to contact with it. That way the chances of a less than perfect landing resulting in bits of carbon fibre or wood being distributed liberally are much reduced.
Choosing a landing site that is relatively smooth will certainly help in the "not tripping up" stakes.
Practice makes perfect - or at least less imperfect.
So to bring my musings to a close...
* I think broken bits of hardware are inevitable in a mode of flying that is so reliant on the human body as a structural part of the takeoff and landing airframe. * Good technique can minimise the damage when it does happen (I know I haven't flown as much as most of you but I'm still on my first prop since I started learning (just you watch, I'll trash it next time now I've said that )) * Any mishap is an opportunity for trainer and trainee to improve their technique.
Finally, anyone got a crystal ball to see far enough ahead to when the next bit of flyable weather will be
Happy flying.