The80s Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 For those who have seen this, do you have any thoughts or opinions about it? Just based on what he is saying I like the idea of better reliability over the 2 stroke, and the improved fuel economy. But based on what we can see in this video, is this something that would be worth holding out for? At the moment I am waiting for an Air Conception model to become available, but I'm torn between that one and this one. 4-Stroke Single cylinder 240cc Engine weight 14.4 kg with exhaust Power 27 HP Fuel consumption 2 litres per hour (86kg pilot + paramotor on 22sqm Ozone Viper 3) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alan_k Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 I don't see how he can call it 'The first true 4 stroke engine for paramotors' when Bailey has had one for years. The fuel economy is fantastic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casper Posted August 1, 2017 Share Posted August 1, 2017 It can take years before it hit the market for all we know. But yes, if it worked well with specs like that, then it's a dream engine for sure. By first he means 4stroke with that power/weight, Bailey is not close to that ratio. Worth to wait for? That depends on the new AC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 I was discussing this engine with EOS distributor I know for years. The fuel economy should be great, but there is one disadvantage which makes me really concerned about it. I was told that 4 stroke valve system is quite complex there and I would not be able to adjust and tune it by myself. I am used to the fact that the engines we fly are not very reliable but at the same time I can service my Moster (as an example) by myself. If it is really different with this engine I would better stay away from it. That's my choice... PS anybody knows, why the cylinder head of this engine look so familiar with Bailey? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyB Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 In the world of Radio Control we have been using 4 strokes for years. If you want he best sounding paaramotor EVER then strap one of these on. These are super reliable and have more power than a Top80. https://www.horizonhobby.com/airplanes/airplane-engines-15042--1/7-cylinder-260cc-4-stroke-gas-radial-engine-evoe7260 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyB Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 ps. it is just 6.7kg !!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 That would be awesome just for how it looks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guy Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 48 minutes ago, AndyB said: In the world of Radio Control we have been using 4 strokes for years. If you want he best sounding paaramotor EVER then strap one of these on. These are super reliable and have more power than a Top80. https://www.horizonhobby.com/airplanes/airplane-engines-15042--1/7-cylinder-260cc-4-stroke-gas-radial-engine-evoe7260 Faaaaantastic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyB Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 And this cheapie one is still 3hp more than a Top80 http://www.sloughrc.com/default.asp?WPG=SRCM_HomePage1&itemid=Q-BH170 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The80s Posted August 16, 2017 Author Share Posted August 16, 2017 9 hours ago, Ivan said: I was discussing this engine with EOS distributor I know for years. The fuel economy should be great, but there is one disadvantage which makes me really concerned about it. I was told that 4 stroke valve system is quite complex there and I would not be able to adjust and tune it by myself. I am used to the fact that the engines we fly are not very reliable but at the same time I can service my Moster (as an example) by myself. If it is really different with this engine I would better stay away from it. That's my choice... PS anybody knows, why the cylinder head of this engine look so familiar with Bailey? I don't mind having to take the motor into a shop and having someone else fix it if it means the motor overall will be significantly more reliable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 Totally agree. What I would mind is sending the motor to the other side of the country by courier services, getting it back in 2 - 3 weeks of precious summer time just to find out that the problem still exists That's what I was seeing throughout being in this sport, at least with Moster you can keep it simple and do most of the things yourself. Sorry for being might be too cautious sometime. I am looking at 4 strike motors for quite a while as it is a pain to do every single take off for cross country with 20 litres of fuel on me but can't see any light and reliable option for now. Hope the situation with this motor will be different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hann__ Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 Does it have to be a 4 stroke, Ivan - what about a Thor 250? Both Morgy and Poz report some imressive economy figures with the large Polini. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 Sure. But Thor 250 weights 18kg (19kg with electric stater) without the radiator and fluid. That's what Polini site states. So I would expect 20 kg at least with the radiator. Some Web sites state 24kg... I am not a superhero Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Harcourt Posted August 19, 2017 Share Posted August 19, 2017 Just for info, The EOS 4 stroke uses a GY6 engine, as does Bailey. It's a Honda designed engine https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GY6_engine. Setting the valve clearance should be no harder than on a Bailey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hann__ Posted August 19, 2017 Share Posted August 19, 2017 22 hours ago, Ivan said: 20 kg at least with the radiator. Some Web sites state 24kg... Wow, didn`t realise it was that heavy! At that weight it totally negates the better fuel efficiency. You`d still be better off with a lighter but thirstier motor with more fuel on board.. You don`t like (the) Bailey? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noddyc Posted August 19, 2017 Share Posted August 19, 2017 I have a thor 200 in a zenith frame and with 10l fuel the weight does not feel heavy at all , it has to do with the way the engine and chassis fit on your back (engine is quite high up on the chassis ). Fuel consumption was around 2l per hour. When I fit my lighter jpx on the same chassis , without any fuel, it feels a lot heavier . The engine sits a lot lower on on the chassis. (On the original bailey chassis it felt like there was no weight at all.) The whole engine chassis design makes a big difference . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casper Posted August 19, 2017 Share Posted August 19, 2017 On 2017-08-16 at 20:02, AndyB said: And this cheapie one is still 3hp more than a Top80 http://www.sloughrc.com/default.asp?WPG=SRCM_HomePage1&itemid=Q-BH170 Wow! that's a nice price for an rc engine at that size. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hann__ Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 12 hours ago, noddyc said: Fuel consumption was around 2l per hour. Two litres per hour! That`s incredible.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guy Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 14 hours ago, Casper said: Wow! that's a nice price for an rc engine at that size. Would anyone be able to calculate how much thrust something like this is capable of producing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyB Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 4 hours ago, Guy said: Would anyone be able to calculate how much thrust something like this is capable of producing? yes, roughly speaking, 3/15 more than the Top 80....so about 20% more than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casper Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 So would an engine like the Moki 400cc 5 cylinder radial engine work? it's about 23hp and weight 9,2 kg. Since it have low rpm and high torque it should work as direct drive. Or even better, the VM R5-420, 5 cylinder from Valach that have 25hp and weighs just 11,8 kg (without exhaust, many options there). Recommended propeller diameter for RC are up to 106cm for the wooden propellers. I'm almost sure a nice lightweight carbon propeller with a slightly bigger diameter would fit. Biggest problem would be cooling as I see it, and maintance. Fuel economy is actually very good according to some websites (better than our 2strokes). Ofc it's not an optimal engine for ppg, but I would love to show up with radial engine on my back, and the sound is magic! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyB Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 I have some very large RC planes one with an 18 kw motor (24hp) There are some downsides as well! Most RC engines are started by flicking the prop, although it is possible to add on a small electric starter. They are more noisy as they use smaller props at higher rpm.....but the radials don't half sound good! I am considering a rather radical approach, which is to use 2 RC engines, each with a 24"/26" prop. These would be counter-rotating so no torque steer. Off-setting the engines front to back allows over-lap of the props in the middle where they are less efficient anyway, behind the pilot. The cage design becomes much smaller and the props would have massive ground clearance! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noddyc Posted August 21, 2017 Share Posted August 21, 2017 Hi Andy Have a look at this youtube video I am thinking of getting myself an paracell kit to fit to my existing chassis , keep us updated I am quite interested in it . Casey 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chrisg547 Posted April 6, 2018 Share Posted April 6, 2018 Whats the chance of the EOS 4 stroke being a good engine? Because if it does what a Moster, weight/power etc, can do. Then ( I hate to use the words ) it could be a game changer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casper Posted April 6, 2018 Share Posted April 6, 2018 From last week:Miroslav Svec The project is alive. This is a video from last week. SHORT STORY: Still facing some issues but a solution is on the way. Hope to test again soon. LONG STORY: The engine seems to run fine but there is a problem with oil above 7000 RPM. When piston moves down, it compresses the air below. That air moves to the top part of the engine (blue cover) and there is a breather to prevent over-pressure. The breather sucks air in and out with every cycle. Unfortunately, at higher RPM the fast moving air spits oil out of the breather. There are labyrinth channels to separate oil from this air but it obviously does not work perfect in certain engine position (lean forward). Next is to install a stand-alone oil separator and see how that works. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.