Thanks for all your replies on these two subjects, but I'm still rather confused about the comments about sink rate, the stated sink rate at 130 kg is 3.8, so surely that's far better than 5.5 and having watched a few YouTube vids,
The landings don't appear too hard, although we have no way of knowing their weight. Obviously, if there's a 10 mph wind, you probably won't be flying forwards into it, but surely it's far better to be facing into wind rather than being blown down wind? Why do the acro pilots have two reserves? I can't imagine it's because of the type of reserve they would throw first, I would have thought it was purely due to the high risk of entanglement through extreme flying. The main point and why I am interested in the Beamer is the fact that it's steerable, you have some input into where you might land, even if it's only limited choice. It wouldn't be that great if you were going to land on a road, reasonably safely, only to get run over by a car or a truck, just as your feet touch the ground or power lines, when you could possibly turn away from them.
But sadly, my choice may have, well, looks to have been already decided because I now find I'm over the max weight if the volution 2 weighs more than the advertised 27.2 kg. I have just noticed on the Parajet web site that the volution Thor has 2 weights quoted, one without a harness 26.1 kg and complete, 27.6 kg, so the harness weighs 1.5 kg. I'll have to try and call Parajet to get a definitive answer.
Thanks everyone, I'm more enlightened in my knowledge, but not sure/convinced wether, if weight permitting, it's good or bad to go with the Beamer II. The importer is a very experienced paraglider and paramotor pilot/instructor, paragliding champion and was a BHPA safety officer, or whatever the title is.