Jump to content

wzh

Members
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

wzh's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. I am planning to replace of a new harness for my paramotor, the old was also apco brand(ten years ago), it is said the apco universal harness can fit for any paramotor frame. Is there anyone used apco universal harness for paramotor? apco introduction following: Above all we took care so the harness has all necessary provision to be adapted to virtually any paramotor frame on the market – both for low and high hook in points.Then we made sure that the harness was even more comfortable with longer and generously padded shoulder straps. Side pockets were added and the harness was made to be universal – one size fits all with zipper expander (zipper closed S/M size, zipper open L/XL size).
  2. clutch is good option, though my engine is hirth F33,without clutch and reduction. it helps landing safty and launch easily.
  3. Fuel consumption test results: 4000 rpm = 2,25 l/h 5000 rpm = 2,66 l/h 5500 rpm = 3,27 l/h 6000 rpm = 4,80 l/h 7000 rpm = 6,74 l/h 7900 rpm = 8,57 l/h
  4. Nitro 200 Engine ,Thrust test results: 72kg thrust with 125cm propeller, standard fit. 74kg thrust with 130cm propeller 80kg thrust in XL version.
  5. air conception Nitro 200 Engine: 200cc. 2 Stroke. 40:1 synthetic oil. 28hp @ 8100 rpm. 1:2.7 belt drive. Nylock long life pull start. 11.3kg engine with steel exhaust. Double compression joint exhaust. Exhaust has built in dB reduction. Carbon fiber silencer. Advanced internal & external engine cooling. Anti slip triple belt life technology. All bolts thread locked and position marked. Tuned for linear throttle response.
  6. base following rule: 1: user guider book must specify them. 2: the power came down evidently. my engine is F33( Germany hirth ),over 200 hours,the power is little down.
  7. I think apco kama SP may fit for you based 17 hrs, thrust may be more advanced for you. I have been flying GIN bolera III for over 100 hr, over 200 times taking off. now I turned to Apco kama SP. kama SP is a little more advanced than kama or GIN Bolera III, and thrust is more adavnced than kama SP.
  8. total take off 108kg without fuel GIN bolera III M szie(85-105kg) hirht F33 (directly driving proper 80cm)
  9. Thanks for replying. Based suggestions,140 fits for free fly, and 160 fits for paramotor. I few GIN bolera III, M size(85-105kg), my total weight of taking off(paramotor) is 111kg,over 6kg. The landing is quick while nil wind, so I am planning to choice a big range.
  10. I am planning to buy a powerply sting for paramotor and free fly , I weight 73kg, and my paramotor weight 27kg, what size I should choice, Sting 140 or sting 160? I cite specification following for reference: Sting 140 : DHV take off weight(kg) 80-105 ; DULV take off weight(kg) 80-140 ; wing weights 6kg Sting 160: DHV take off weight(kg) 95-125 ; DULV take off weight(kg) 95-160 ; wing weights 6kg
  11. my opionio is "going for a smaller one and be on the heavier side of it's weight range". e.g GIN bolera III M size (85-105kg), the good range is 100--105kg
  12. Hi, Miro Here are serveral engines test, you may refer them. those experiment gave the relationship about the thrust, proper, pilot weight ,fuel Consumption etc. you weight 85kg and is Category STANDARD. I think 20 HP engine(at least) fit you,such as ros 125,M25 . PPG buyer's guide http://www.ojovolador.com/ppg/tables/standard.html
  13. wzh

    G6 Power

    G6 is popular in China, and fit for light weight pilots.
  14. pitch should match up to cruise speed of paramotor. If pitch is too small, the thrust will decrease rapidly while you run for taking off,and you cann't fily.
×
×
  • Create New...